If you find yourself yelling and bullying when people can’t hear you during Zoom, you’re not alone. The better the video of an online meeting is to humiliate, the more likely it is to start talking, a new study by researchers at Radboud University and the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics found. People change their practices to pay. Their findings are published today on Royal Society Open Science good book.
Speaking over Zoom or Skype, we use some of the same methods to listen to ourselves as we use the real world, says James Trujillo, the original author of the paper and a cognitive science degree at Radboud University and the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. “If you’re talking to someone in a workplace with a lot of back noise, you usually use actions to support your conversation, and you start talking loudly. When we talk on the video phone, there are problems. It makes it harder for people to understand each other from technology problems. However, we always use the same methods to address those problems. “
Analyzing video phones
For the study, Trujillo and colleagues placed video calls among the twenty participants. Participants sat in separate rooms, and were said to talk normally for 40 minutes. During the phone, the video quality decreased by ten steps, from very clear to very blurry. The researchers looked at how people changed their language and how the phone rang.
Previously, when the quality of the video decreased, participants had slightly reduced their arm and body strength, the researchers found. However, as things get worse, they start to move. The speed, agility and amount of activity quickly increased at first, and then to a plateau. Those who used the functions during the video call increased to 5 decibels when the video quality began to decline. Although the quality of the picture decreased and the participants could not see each other, they continued to use the actions and talk loudly.
Trujillo said “what shows is that language and action are combined. People are compensating for the loss of features by replacing them with louder language and great features. E. as people talk on the phone: we don’t know each other, and when we’re talking we’re constantly moving and locked up. “
A full picture for future research
“Preliminary research has shown about language and methods, but our first is to look at the effect of features on our culture in those fields,” Trujillo said. “It shows the way we speak and the ways we act that have changed to meet our demands. Our experience shows that speech and nature are two interrelated forms of communication.”
“What this study shows is that if you’re learning how to communicate, you have to look at the full picture. Some researchers have said that things are just additions to language, it doesn’t matter. In addition, we do not see how people use loud language to compensate for lost jobs, or in any other way. … but to incorporate these works into a better understanding of the character of the people. ”
Evidence from the hands can be seen as the beginning of human speech
James P. Trujillo et al, A major study of the response of the human communication system to visual acuity. Royal Society Open Science (2022). DOI: 10.1098 / rsos.211489
Presented by Radboud University Nijmegen
Directions: Why we shout video phone if image is ambiguous (2022, April 13) downloaded on April 14, 2022 from https://phys.org/news/2022-04-shout-video-image -blurry.html
This document is copyrighted. Except for appropriate action for the purpose of personal inquiry or research, no piece may be reproduced without permission. Information is provided for informational purposes only.