Why the nurses would get angry and leave after RaDonda Vaught’s decision

(Hannah Norman / KHN)

Emma Moore thought the corner. At the health center in Portland, Oregon, the 29 -year -old nurse said she was depressed and training. Coronavirus patients flocked to the office for two years, and Moore had a hard time keeping up.

Then the relationship is clear. On March 25, about 2,400 miles from a Tennessee courtroom, former nurse RaDonda Vaught was convicted of two felonies and sentenced to eight years in prison for a deadly drug charge.

Like many nurses, Moore wondered if it was him. He had wronged the medicine before, even though it wasn’t too bad. But what about the future? In the case of the health care chef of the sick period, another mistake was considered.

Four days after Vaught’s decision, Moore left. He said Vaught’s words helped his decision.

“It’s not fair to expect this to happen,” Moore said, “if I’m in a position that’s set to fail.”

After the Vaught trial – a very serious case of a health care worker convicted of a medical crime – nurses and nursing organizations condemned the decision through tens of thousands of posts, sharing, comments, and videos. They realize that the downfall of their careers is to lower and eliminate the levels of nursing care that are accelerated by the disease. Ultimately, they say, is to improve health care for all.

Submissions from the American Nurses Association, the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, and the National Medical Association said each of Vaught’s thoughts created a “terrible start.” Linda Aiken, a nurse and sociology professor at the University of Pennsylvania, said that while Vaught’s case was an “outlier,” nurses would be less likely to report offenses.

“One thing that everyone agrees on is that it reduces the exposure of faults or near -faults, which can have a detrimental effect on safety,” Aiken said. “The only way you can really learn about the flaws in these complex systems is for people to say,‘ Yeah, I almost gave up the wrong drug because … ‘

“Yeah, there’s nothing to say right now.”

Fear and anger over Vaught’s case have flown among nurses on Facebook, Twitter, and Reddit. At TikTok, a video site that is very popular among medical professionals, videos with the hashtag “#RaDondaVaught” have more than 47 million views.

Vaught’s supporters complained about his interest on Change.org, an application site. And thousands have joined a Facebook group planning to mobilize protest outside of Vaught’s sentencing in May.

Ashley Bartholomew, 36, of Tampa, Florida, a nurse who followed the trial via YouTube and Twitter, played on the fear of others. Nurses have long felt the “impossible situation” due to rising staff responsibilities and inefficiencies, he said, especially in hospitals working with lean staff models.

“The big answer we’re seeing is because we all know exactly how well the disease has exacerbated the problems that exist,” Bartholomew said. And “set a ground for criminal prosecution [for] The only mistake that can make this happen. “

Vaught, who works at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, was sentenced to death by Charlene Murphey, a 75 -year -old patient who died of a drug accident in 2017. Murphey was referred to a a sedative, Versed, but Vaught did not return a strong anti -inflammatory drug, vecuronium, from a simple drugstore and give it to the patient.

Plaintiffs argued that Vaught did not look at the many signs that he quit the wrong medication and did not look at Murphey after being given a terminal illness. Vaught was at fault but he said it was a mistake – not a mistake.

Some of Vaught’s friends support the faith.

Scott Shelp, a California nurse with a small YouTube stream, posted an “unpopular opinion” that Vaught would have to serve 26 minutes in prison. “We have to hold on to each other,” he said, “but we can’t resist what can’t be resisted.”

Shelp said he would not commit the same crime as Vaught and “neither would any nurse.” Concerned neo -hippies and their global warming, Shelp said it would be “inappropriate” for nurses to “be fired” from the profession.

“In other situations, I can’t trust anyone – including nurses – to agree that‘ I don’t think ’is a serious defense,” Shelp said. “Punishment for wrongdoing actually committed by someone.

Vaught was acquitted of manslaughter but convicted of petty felony, felony manslaughter, and maltreatment of a sick adult. As anger spread among the media, the Nashville state law firm defended the controversy, saying in a statement “it is not a lawsuit against the nursing profession or the healthy community. “

“This case, and all of them, is about the same person who committed 17 serious, and non -violent acts, that killed an elderly woman,” said agency spokesman Steve Hayslip. . “The jury found Vaught’s actions under the protocols and standard of care, so the jury (including a long -term nurse and a health care professional) returned the wrongful sentence below. It’s four o’clock. “

The office of Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee confirmed that he would not consider clemency for Vaught despite the Change.org petition, which collected about 187,000 signatures on April 4.

Lee said Casey Black, apart from death penalty cases, the governor relies on the Parole Board to speak to defendants for the crime, only after sentencing and with class trial.

But the controversy surrounding Vaught’s case is not far off. On April 4, more than 8,200 people joined a Facebook group planning a march to protest outside the courthouse when he was sentenced on May 13.

Among the organizers of the event was Tina Viant, host of “The Good Nurse Doesn’t Good,” a podcast that followed Vaught’s case and countered his lawsuit.

“I don’t know how Nashville will deal with it,” Visant said of the protest during a recent incident involving Vaught’s trial. “A lot of people are coming from all over.”

Related topics

Contact us Submit a story advice

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.