When you do something that you do wrong, how long have you been really guilty of your wrongdoing? Will your sins be forgiven if you are forgiven? This is one of the questions asked by a Florida State University researcher who is editing a new article published this winter in the newspaper World. Personal Studies.
Randolph Clarke, a professor with the Department of Philosophy at the FSU College of Arts and Sciences, analyzes the basics of guilt, responsibility, guilt and more in his recent research article, “Still Guilty.” Clarke’s research provides thought -provoking arguments about crime.
“We’re all accustomed to guilt: we cup and get.” For a while, I thought about guilt, what needs to be condemned and what needs to be condemned. the crime. “
In his paper, Clarke argues that when someone is convicted of a crime, they remain so, regardless of whether they forgive or correct the person they have hurt. Such actions can improve their wrong feelings and restore a relationship with the wrong side, but always wrong.
“I thought: Forgiveness and correction are good things to do, but they’re not going to blame you anymore,” Clarke said. “As far as I know, if you’re wrong about something, you’re always wrong about it.”
Because Clarke sees the strength of the paper, many scholars believe that when a person is guilty of something, they can act to make them feel guilty again. For example, when they feel guilty or remorseful for something they have done, they can forgive those they have hurt and correct. This eliminates the feeling of guilt
Clarke adds that many scholars who hold this view say that some people are only wrong if they have to be hurt. They know that you can be hurt for all the wrong you have suffered because of the wrong given, and when you do, they say you will never be guilty again for that wrong. For example, a person may feel guilty for a crime committed many years ago, sometimes, “hurt.”
“They need to be about this big: you can suffer all the wrongs that you have to suffer for a given wrong,” Clarke said. “And I offer one more thing: it may be that in the future no one will condemn you for any past crime. But these things do not show that you can stop it. You must be guilty again even though no one will accuse you. “
When it comes to the long -suffering criminals of the past who can no longer be hurt by guilt or remorse, with Clarke giving the example of Adolf Hitler, our association may be worthwhile. To them as much as possible, Clarke said. . He realized that the idea he had been arguing about, even wrong, could not be argued later.
Clarke suggests that readers take in some important distinctions: The difference between resentment and the right to feel guilty or remorseful; and between the question of whether someone is wrong and the question of whether we, or the other person, should blame that person.
“Sometimes we’re sorry, and sometimes that’s the right thing to do – we don’t have to keep complaining,” Clarke said. “But what is forgiven is sin. So if anyone is guilty and deserves to be condemned, it is different.”
Clarke, whose critical research on human resources, including perceived labor, free will and cultural responsibility, has published several books and papers on these topics. and papers on ethics, critical thinking and attitudes in his or her more than 30 years at the school. .
“I’m learning the basics of human rights and ethics,” Clarke said. “People are interesting, and these aspects of our social life are endless.”
Piers Rawling, director of the Department of Philosophy, said Clarke’s research continues to challenge existing paradigms and provides new insights into philosophical principles, as well as his field of study – philosophy of action – covers a wide range of issues, with which we do the right thing. responsible for our actions.
Defining the fault helps make AI work better
Randolph Clarke, always wrong, Personal Studies (2022). DOI: 10.1007 / s11098-022-01779-5
Presented by Florida State University
Directions: Philosopher looks at guilt and guilt in new research (2022, March 30) retrieved 31 March 2022 from https://phys.org/news/2022-03-philosopher-guilt-blame.html
This document is subject to copyright. Except for appropriate action for the purpose of personal inquiry or research, no piece may be reproduced without permission. Information is provided for informational purposes only.