‘No Antibiotics’ Beef Tests Positive, Study Finds

April 8, 2022

Some cattle have been successfully tested in a no-antibiotics program for antibiotics, which may question the label “grown without antibiotics” on products, according to a new study in Science.

The majority of the cattle in the study – about 85% – tested poorly for antibiotics. However, 10% from lots where one bull showed well, and another 5% from lots with many good tests.

“These data provide empirical evidence that a significant portion of beef products are being marketed [raised without antibiotics] Labels from cattle treated with drugs, ”the authors wrote.

Researchers at George Washington University’s Antibiotic Resistance Action Center and Food In-Depth, a food testing group, tested the urine of nearly 700 cows at a slaughterhouse that makes cattle “bred with lack of antibiotics ”. All cattle are part of the “no antibiotics ever” program, with a portion created under the Global Animal Partnership program, an animal health census program pioneered and operated by Whole Foods.

Using a rapid test to record 17 different drugs regularly given feed and water, the research team tested animals from each animal given for work on the farm. slaughterhouse more than seven months. They tested animals from 312 districts and 33 different farms, reporting about 38,000 cows or 12% of U.S. dairy- without antibiotic-free cattle production during the training period.

The researchers found that there were three feeding camps in which all the samples were well tested for antibiotics, and four feeding camps where all the samples were well tested in the same camp. . In addition, seven feedlots had a better sample than one sample, and 14 had at least one good animal sample.

Overall, more and less one positive report indicates that about 15% of non-antibiotic-reared cattle were treated at the slaughterhouse at seven months. About 26% of the cattle registered for the Global Animal Partnership program were obtained from a large number with one successful test.

“These findings highlight the inadequacy of today’s RWA labels,” the authors wrote. “While our testing is limited to beef, beef and other poultry will suffer from the same stimulants.”

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is being sued for looking at antibiotic use and confirming labels such as “elevated without antibiotics,” according to The Washington Post. A USDA statement told the newspaper the agency would look into the study to decide on future actions but said “there is no evidence in the study that meat is not safe. up to.”

The Global Animal Partnership is monitoring the results, the newspaper reported.

“It’s hard to see how much of a problem we have, whether we have a real system or a bad waste,” said Anne Malleau, project director. The Washington Post.

Whole Foods also said it was true to its promise to have no antibiotics for its cattle, Spencer Taylor, the company’s chief operating officer, told the newspaper.

“We have thoroughly evaluated the information we have and there is no reason to believe that the cattle tested in this study have run out of products in our store,” Taylor said. “We take great care of compliance and will not hesitate to act if the supplier does not meet our core standards.”

The authors cited a number of policy adjustments, including a strong USDA certification system to ensure the accuracy of requirements is “grown without antibiotics”.

Under the current system, the USDA’s designation of “grown without antibiotics” can only go to manufacturers to sign an affidavit and submit documents supporting their demands, the newspaper reported. The USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Services certifies documents submitted with label applications and may remove the label if there is evidence that the requirements are inaccurate.

At the same time, the USDA is testing for “high residual thresholds” that look at antibiotic levels that indicate harm to human health, rather than zero antibiotics, the newspaper reported.

“For critical validation, the USDA must be guided and required to continue empirical testing on the site for antibiotics in a large number of animals from each region assigned for processing,” he wrote. and writers.

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.