How did the disease come about?

For the past two years, I and others have explained the ways in which the death toll of COVID-19 is calculated to make the diagnosis of the disease more effective than the diagnosis. real thing.

Now, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and states are returning their mortality figures, proving that we are right. Deaths were once increased for political reasons, but now they are lowered for the same reason.

CDC releases more than 72,000 COVID deaths

As reported by The Defender,1 On March 14, 2022, the CDC removed 72,277 “COVID deaths” from the record, with 24% of those involving children under 18.2,3 They said that a “coding logic error,” an error -free algorithm, counted deaths that were not related to COVID. As Udumbara points out:4

“Some of the pediatric deaths associated with COVID-19, according to the CDC’s Wonder system, are related to deaths due to death or drug use. The cause of death. “

However, the CDC has used false mortality rates among children to shoot COVID shots for children 5 to 7 years of age. In November 2021, CDC CEO Rochelle Walensky shared that data to validate the recommendation to issue emergency use for the Pfizer shooter for this year’s group.5

For one thing, we think it took the CDC two years to identify this crime. Unbelievable, The Epoch Times filed a Freedom of Information Act petition for local conversations about information change.6

Surprisingly, the correction came at the heels of articles that actually “debunking” it was said that COVID was fatal. For example, in early March, Health Feedback said “there is no evidence for the prevalence of COVID deaths,” and “the evidence shows a difference.”7 Here we are, however. The death toll was clear, not reduced. The age of that fact is not good.

The CDC has become an advertising agency

Dr.’s place. Meryl Nass, a member of Children’s Health Defense’s scientific advisory committee, says the CDC uses data to validate her health policies, and when she is arrested, she only complains about her “IT system. old. ” In an article on March 19, 2022, he wrote:8

“The CDC is not a public health organization. It is a public health agency that collects a lot of data. The CDC builds its vast database to produce evidence that supports current health policies …

A Senate report for the CDC revealed that in 2007, the office spent $ 106 million on the Thomas R. Harkin Global Communications (and Visitor) Center, and its 115 -page report summarized as follows. :

‘An evaluation of a company’s use in fighting and preventing disease costs hundreds of millions of dollars in taxes for non -prevention, global junkets, and museums, but it cannot be shown to prevent the disease. ‘ ”

Health officials stop reporting COVID-19 deaths

Surprisingly, three months before the CDC began to change its death toll, U.S. Health and Human Services stopped collecting data on hospitalizations and deaths. from COVID-19. HHS announced9 changes to reporting requirements for hospitals and critical care departments January 6, 2022. The new guidelines, implemented on 2 February, note that “Monthly leave is not required to be reported. , “including” the day before COVID- 19 death.

What are they trying to hide? Are they stopping the flow of data to prevent it from being viewed and viewed? According to some, HHS hospital data is one of the best we have in the US, so it is not appropriate to end data collection. January 2021, Alex C. Madrigal, founder of the COVID Tracking Project, wrote:10

“In the course of the reviews we’ve run over the past few months, we’ve come to the same conclusion as the other publishers. The hospital data that is coming out of HHS now is the same. Better and more public information about the disease. “

An unnamed federal health official spoke with an announcer from WSWS,11 calls for move to stop reporting COVID-29 hospital deaths “not clear.” The official added:

“It’s the only reliable, reliable data that can be done at the federal level. Ninety -nine percent of hospitals report 100% of the data on a daily basis. I don’t know any scientists who want to have access to it. little information. ”

Changing the definitions validates the COVID record

Since the onset of the disease, changes have allowed the authorities to falsify the data in any way they need to. Now, states are beginning to change the way they define a “COVID death,” resulting in higher death rates. In Massachusetts, for example, the death toll of COVID dropped to 3,700 after the state changed its definition to comply with the State Council and Territorial Epidemiologists.12

As reported by CBS Boston:13

“The state has now said the COVID definition of death is the person who had the disease listed as the cause of death on their death certificate. There were also those who had the disease in 60 cases. but the cause was not listed on their death certificate.Under the new definition, the period was changed to 30 days for people without COVID disease on their death certificate.

Historically, listing a person who died for some reason as a COVID death because they had tried well within 30 days of their death is an incorrect way to determine. the high number of deaths from this disease, because we know that PCR tests are misleading. a good score of about 97% when running in 35 laps or more,14 as it hath been from the beginning.

Results from home experiments are not reported

The case numbers are being edited below. In mid -January 2022, the Biden team began delivering half a billion in home COVID testing to the American public.15 and consequences from those that are not reported everywhere.16 As a result, the number of cases will be reduced. 13NewsNow’s post:17

“… the drop in case numbers is the reason health officials are keeping track of COVID-19 metrics, including hospitalizations, deaths, and now, viral samples in bad water.18 – the metrics don’t rely on people who go to the test and report the results they get at home.

However, HHS no longer requires hospitals to report COVID deaths, which is one of the metrics health officials think they are focusing on instead of looking at cases. Don’t get me wrong, PCR testing was a scam from the start and I don’t think we should pay much attention to that data. The implication here is that recording the COVID data is incorrect from the start.

What they are trying to do is move to a passive focus, starting with the melting pot.19 Ultimately, the goal is to look at each person’s life processes in real time, and this was part of the transhumanist Fourth Industrial Revolution and The Great Reset.

CDC withholds information

To make matters even more murky, the CDC is hiding the data on COVID and COVID jab databases. The idea behind some information not being shared with the public is that people “mislead” the data. In other words, the data shows that COVID jabs don’t work, and the CDC doesn’t want them to be widely known.

He also collected data on the effect of COVID-19 stimulants, but for some reason did not include data for 18- to 49-year-olds in any of his publications. “At the right time,” he said, “the group will at least benefit from more images,” the Times pointed out, adding:21

“Much of the information that has been suppressed can help health officials and health officials be more effective in their efforts to bring disease under control. The detailed data and with timely access to hospitals by year and nation to help health officials identify and assist the population at high risk. mortality by age and cancer have helped determine if healthy cats need booster shots. ”

COVID served a clean political agenda

In the last two years, the disease has been used to introduce radical changes that would not have been tolerated if not for widespread panic. It was used to enforce election rules, which were seen as a result of the 2020 election.

It was used to propagate the immediate need for the “Great Reset” and the Fourth Industrial Revolution. It has been used to strip basic human rights, and to justify radical environmental policies that result in lower living standards.

It has also been used to quickly change the vaccine industry from treating common disease to using eggs to using gene modification technology. The only thing is that the disease is not used to create recommendations that really improve public health. And all over the world, the data is printed and edited to make sure it is inaccurate.

Now, the data is clear again – this time to end the COVID problem that could allow Biden to take credit for it in the next election. As stated in a February 24, 2022, letter from Impact Research, entitled “Taking the Win Over COVID-19”:22,23

“Now is the time for Democrats to take credit for ending the COVID crisis period of the COVID war, pointing to significant victories such as providing grain and providing for the economy. for America, and fully participate in the reconstruction that comes after a war. Below we lay out some planning ideas for Democrats positioning themselves on COVID-19 … “

The planning stage is about reporting the crisis level; demanding for “common sense and practice;” and taking the side of those who were burned at COVID and don’t want to hear more about it. It doesn’t set a standard of zero COVID as a “win -win situation,” and “stops talking about fixed assets and the future.”

“If Democrats maintain a posture that it’s more about caring for COVID than learning how to live in a world where COVID lives, but doesn’t rule, they have a hard time paying too much. it will be in November. “ the scripture says.24

Dr. Anthony Fauci may not have had this message, because he is out there signaling that we can expect to return to the COVID limits at any time. In mid -March in a CNN interview, he said “we need to be flexible” and “if we see a resurgence, we need to pivot and return to a level of mitigation like We can’t just say ‘We’re done, now we’ll move on.’ ”

Based on what we’ve seen so far, I wouldn’t be surprised if this “pivot” comes in the form of a COVID crisis before the midterm election.

rnc research tweet

>>>>> Click here <<<<<

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.