Global consent creates public perception of drone warfare


Available: CC0 Public Domain

Warlords receive public support and need to get international approval from organizations such as the United Nations, according to a study led by a team of Cornell researchers.

Weapons -carrying drones are widely used as counterterrorism instruments, but countries are used and seized by strikes. France, for example, submitted its grievances to the UN for approval; The US is not normal.

This is a significant contrast to public support and feelings of legitimacy, according to medical students Paul Lushenko and Shyam Raman, and Sarah Kreps, the John L. Wetherill Professor of Government at the College of Arts. and Science and Professor at the Cornell Jeb E. Brooks School of Public Policy.

Researchers are showing signs of two drone strikes in 2021. France has used a drone to kill Adnan al-Sahrawi, the leader of the Islamic State in western Africa. Shortly afterwards, the U.S. used drones to kill two al-Qaida leaders in Syria.

Although the weapons were similar, the approaches were not the same. France had previously approached the UN to secure support; the US acted unilaterally.

To find a way to have more public support and interest, the researchers conducted a study of a survey of 1,800 respondents in France and the U.S. The results were significant. and showed greater support and legitimacy when the drone was approved. it is intended to comply with the laws of the land.

The country of birth of the respondents played, however. The French respondents saw the inferiority of their country or others. The Americans saw the unilateral conflict in their own country and needed more support. These results suggest that Americans and French citizens support unique aspects of drone warfare.

Researchers say the “French model” of drone warfare based on a piece of landmass was the case for the French invasion of West Africa.

“While drones are proliferating around the world, we lack awareness of the general characteristics of the attack, especially on a local level,” Lushenko said. “Our research shows that public perceptions of appropriate strikes are not a matter of goal. The actual awareness of strikes can be compared to those who use drones and how they prevent them. “It shows that the world’s acceptance through the UN has serious consequences for the war on public opinion.”

Lushenko has a Ph.D. candidate in the field of international relations, and a Scholar General Andrew Jackson Goodpaster. Raman is a Ph.D. students in the field of analysis and management. An article about their research, “Multilateralism and Public Support for Drone Strikes,” was published in the April issue of Research and politics.

The legacy of 9/11 has changed drone warfare as we look at the military

More information:
Paul Lushenko et al, Multilateralism and public support for drone strikes, Research and politics (2022). DOI: 10.1177 / 20531680221093433

Presented by Cornell University

Directions: Global Perceptions of Drone Warfare (2022, April 14) Retrieved April 14, 2022 from warfare.html

This document is subject to copyright. Except for appropriate action for the purpose of personal inquiry or research, no piece may be reproduced without permission. Information is provided for informational purposes only.

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.