It’s even better to talk about genetically modified organisms (GMOs), according to new Alliance for Science research that analyzes traditional and social aspects in biotechnology.
Peer-reviewed study, published in an open-source textbook GM plants and foodsSees a significant drop in the salience of the GMO crisis between 2018 and 2020, indicating a more positive and polarized conversation around the world.
“This seems like good news for science,” said research author Mark Lynas, research leader at the Alliance for Science (AfS). “Based on the global scientific data on the safety and effectiveness of genetic modification, this indicates a lack of accurate knowledge about GMOs in its potential for mutation. Even in the online business. “
“The data in the report is a real change in a positive conversation and perception about GMOs,” added author Joan Conrow, AfS editor. “This shows that people are increasingly embracing technologies that can play a role in reducing the natural impacts of agriculture, especially in relation to climate change.”
The study looked at the number and volume of 100,000 online and published articles published in English at the highest level between 2018 and 2020 and 1.7 million media views.
It was found that the overall tone of the GMO discussion was positive, 73 percent better when independent and positive feedback were combined, and it was found to be more effective when studied.
While the media industry is better than traditional, that share has shrunk, with public engagement improving from 62 percent to 78 percent by the end of 2020.
The training was conducted in conjunction with Cision, an observational and knowledge center, and Cision used English language media data. Conceptual analysis is developed using real -time automated computer analysis, using Cision’s native language and standard language dictionaries. Part of it also has to do with human verification.
“Today, this study presents some of the most comprehensive insights into GMO awareness in social media and news media platforms, using three years of continuity and monitoring. Led by our team at Cision, “said co -author Jordan Adams, a senior data analyst at Cision.
While the amount of traditional media advertising increased during the study, social media coverage fell by more than 80 percent between January 2018 and December 2020, the period covered by the study. research. Due to the small number of people advertising about GMOs, it indicates a decrease in the problem, the authors conclude.
“Our data shows that in all media platforms, we are moving to a better conversation on GMOs,” Lynas said. “This is in line with other forms of ‘debate’ that are seen as losing light on serious real -world issues, such as talking about food security in a transformative way.”
Monsanto’s (now Bayer division) study and its combination with pesticides, such as glyphosate, have also been found to strongly lead to negative perceptions about GMOs, although the company is the only player in the GMO field. Monsanto / Bayer’s coverage on the traditional side and social media has always been more and less effective than covering all GMOs.
In addition, “bot” stories reported that 10 percent of Twitter users participated in GMO discussions between 2018 and 2020 and accounted for 10 percent of the total number of tweets. Observations show that bots and cyborgs are more interested in GMOs than in human history.
“This shows that cyborgs and bots can be used by criminals to sow discord and make GMO communication more efficient and polarized than it is,” he said. research.
Although only English was analyzed, research was the subject of the world.
“The good is being seen in Africa, where countries are starting to use technology,” the report said. “Communication (GMO) is good in the US, Africa and South Asia.”
The Alliance for Science is a global communication program founded at the Boyce Thompson Institute.
Sickness type: worse than a bad Monday
Sarah Evanega et al, The state of the ‘GMO’ debate – about a media conversation that is more or less polarized in ag -biotech ?, GM plants and foods (2022). DOI: 10.1080 / 21645698.2022.2051243
Presented by Boyce Thompson Institute
Directions: Anti-GMO policies are disappearing around the world, reveals a new scientific paper (2022, March 29) retrieved 30 March 2022 from https://phys.org/news/2022-03-anti -gmo-themes-traction-worldwide- ʻepekema.html
This document is subject to copyright. Except for appropriate work for the purpose of personal inquiry or research, no piece may be reproduced without permission. Information is provided for informational purposes only.